USPTO serial 79003375
FAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Baxley
CHARLES E BAXLEY HART, BAXLEY, DANIELS & HOLTON3RD FL90 JOHN STNEW YORK, NY 10038-3242Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer peripherals, computers, copying machines; phototelegraphy apparatuses, namely picture transmitters, amplifiers, pixel, picture receivers, analyzers, picture size controllers and picture light and color adjusters; inner telegraphic apparatuses, namely transmitters, amplifiers, interrupters and receivers; optical telegraph apparatuses, namely optical interrupters, switches, amplifiers and optical indicators; DVDs featuring music, theatrical entertainment and non fictional works; slide projectors; deposit apparatuses for laboratories; computer apparatuses for automobiles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Desicating apparatuses, namely dryers, ovens, vacuum chambers and desicating electrodes; domestic air-conditioning installations; ventilation louvers; air-conditioning fans; hair dryers for domestic use; exhaust fans for HVACs, heating apparatuses namely electric space heaters; clothes dryers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by XINRUILIAN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by XINRUILIAN ELECTRONICS (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named FAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 8, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |