USPTO serial 79003462
WATERMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, SEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WATERMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for the optimization of business processes, within and between manufacturing companies and companies involved in the transformation of products, through Information Technology, including standard software applications developed by other companies; afore-mentioned goods except apparatus and instruments, all for identifying and decoding magnetically recorded information for dispersing and collecting of magnetically encoded tickets, magnetically encoded cards and of magnetically encoded personal cards as well as for controlling of access to enclosed areas by means of such tickets, cards and personal cards; plastic cards and tickets and personal cards with magnetically encoded information for security purposes; afore-mentioned goods also except computer software for facilitating treatment and printing of documents of paper and telefax; also except electronic equipment for the protection of information signals and consultancy regarding computers and data processing technologies with respect to the protection of information signals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business intermediary services and consultancy in the purchase and sales of goods as mentioned in class 9; import, export and distribution (sale) of the goods mentioned in class 9; demonstration of the goods mentioned in class 9 for publicity purposes; market canvassing, marketing research, marketing studies; consultancy on the subject of business organization and business economy; afore-mentioned services also rendered with the help of the multimedia | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design, development and implementation of software as mentioned in class 9; professional consultancy in the field of ICT; services of ICT specialists; rental and provision of software as mentioned in class 9; afore-mentioned services also rendered with the help of the multimedia | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2013 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |