Drawing for KARLOVARSKA BECHEROVKA ORIGINAL SINCE 1807

USPTO serial 79003502

KARLOVARSKA BECHEROVKA ORIGINAL SINCE 1807

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3095786Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 23, 2006
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KARLOVARSKA BECHEROVKA ORIGINAL SINCE 1807?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan Behr

ALAN BEHR ALSTON & BIRD LLP90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic beverages, namely aerated and mineral waters, fruit juice, fruit drinks, carbonated soft drinks and beerSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, liqueurs and spiritsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 15, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 18, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 31, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 28, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 6, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 11, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 26, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 28, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 13, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2005DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance