Drawing for POWERPACTOR

USPTO serial 79003537

POWERPACTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3041910Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 10, 2006
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERPACTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam D. Siegartel

Adam D. Siegartel Proskauer Rose, LLP1585 BroadwayNew York, NY 10036-8299UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Processing machines for powdery substances, namely roll presses for use in chemical, pharmaceutical and industrial industry.SECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2009INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 25, 2009INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2009C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
May 6, 2009CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 4, 2009CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Feb 4, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2008PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 5, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 29, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2005LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance