Drawing for BOLONI

USPTO serial 79003556

BOLONI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3068369Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 14, 2006
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOLONI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles M. Marmelstein

CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWSTE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Oil smoke extractors, namely, range hoods for domestic use; gas burners for domestic use; ovens, namely, microwave ovens and induction ovens; electric cooking ranges; electric water heaters for domestic use; electric radiators used for heating buildings; portable toilets; drinking water dispensersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 31, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 13, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 14, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 18, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 19, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 16, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance