Drawing for ERAYBA

USPTO serial 79003591

ERAYBA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ERAYBA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003All kinds of perfumery and cosmetic products, namely, hair shampoos, hair lotions, hair dyes, hair waving preparations, hair masks, conditioners, hair sprays and hair gels, lacquers, hair foam, hair coloring substances, bleaching substances, toilet soaps, liquid soaps for the face, body and hands, perfumes, essential oils for personal useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 25, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 4, 2016FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2008DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 11, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 19, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 17, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance