Drawing for BEAUFOND

USPTO serial 79003595

BEAUFOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3046313Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 17, 2006
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAUFOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bingham B. Leverich, Marie A. Lavalleye, Hope I. Hamilton, Kathleen T. Gallagher-Duff, Kristina Rosette

BINGHAM B LEVERICH, MARIE A LAVALLEYE COVINGTON & BURLING1201 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, wines, liqueurs, after-meal liqueurs and brandies, distilled wines, particularly originating from the vineyards of Charente, cognac, namely, French brandySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2013UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 9, 2013DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 6, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 25, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 13, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 6, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 8, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 29, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 20, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance