USPTO serial 79003703
STELVIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2995410Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2005
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STELVIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PECHINEY CAPSULES (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
FR
Other trademarks owned by PECHINEY CAPSULES (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
PECHINEY CAPSULES (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
FR
Other trademarks owned by PECHINEY CAPSULES (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
PECHINEY CAPSULES (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
FR
Other trademarks owned by PECHINEY CAPSULES (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
AMCOR FLEXIBLES CAPSULES FRANCE SAS
FR
Other trademarks owned by AMCOR FLEXIBLES CAPSULES FRANCE SAS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Pelletier, Jr.
George A. Pelletier, Jr. Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PECHINEY CAPSULES (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
- Other trademarks owned by PECHINEY CAPSULES (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
- Other trademarks owned by PECHINEY CAPSULES (Société par Actions Simplifiée)
- Other trademarks owned by AMCOR FLEXIBLES CAPSULES FRANCE SAS
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named STELVIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2007 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 26, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |