Drawing for ELEPHANT

USPTO serial 79003710

ELEPHANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2970811Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 19, 2005
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ELEPHANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Disc filtering and sludge thickening units for waste water treatment for industrial useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 18, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 17, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 21, 2025ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 23, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 26, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 16, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 9, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2011CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Nov 25, 2011CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 1, 2011CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 1, 201171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 24, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 31, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2006RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 27, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance