Drawing for ONE WATCH COMPANY

USPTO serial 79003732

ONE WATCH COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3120835Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 25, 2006
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE WATCH COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L. Bikoff

JAMES L BIKOFF SILVERBERG GOLDMAN & BIKOFF LLPGEORGETOWN PL1101 30TH ST NW STE 120WASHINGTON, DC 20007-3768

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS; JEWELRY, PRECIOUS STONES; HOROLOGICAL AND CHRONOMETRIC INSTRUMENTSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 4, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 4, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 22, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 1, 2009CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 16, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 23, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2006ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 2, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance