Drawing for BACK-2-NATURE

USPTO serial 79003737

BACK-2-NATURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2992693Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 6, 2005
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BACK-2-NATURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas P. Arden

Thomas P. Arden Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane, P.C.3001 W. Big Beaver RoadSuite 624Troy, MI 48084-3107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Animal litterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 24, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 12, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 8, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 9, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 16, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 16, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 4, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 26, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 14, 2011NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 201171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 14, 201115AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Oct 13, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 7, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 16, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance