USPTO serial 79003752
ERBA MANNHEIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ERBA MANNHEIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Laboratory Reagents for medical use, namely, Medical Diagnostic Reagents, Controls, Calibrators, Standards, for In Vitro Diagnostics as regards medical as well as veterinary use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Scientific Instrument/ Analysers for In Vitro Medical Diagnostic purposes, namely, Fully Automatic Instruments, Semi Automatic Instruments, specifically - Instruments / Analysers in relation to Bio-Chemistry, Immunology, Haematology, Coagulation, Critical Care, Immuno-Haematology, Urine Chemistry, Histopathology, Radioimmunology, Microbiology, Molecular Biology, Such Instruments / Analysers may be Open Systems and / or Closed Systems. Apparatus for In Vitro Medical Diagnostic purposes, namely, Mechanical Pipettes, Electronic Pipettes, Pipette Controllers and Dispensers, Micro Pipette Tips | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Medical and Veterinary Diagnostic Instruments Analysers for In Vitro Medical Diagnostic puposes, namely, Fully Automatic Instruments, Semi Automatic Instruments, specifically Instruments, Analysers in relation to Bio-Chemistry, Immunology, Haematology, Coagulation, Critical Care, Immuno-Haematology, Urine Chemistry, Histopathology, Radioimmunology, Microbiology, Molecular Biology, Such Instruments, Analysers may be Open Systems and / or Closed Systems, Apparatus for In Vitro Medical Diagnostic purposes, namely, Mechanical Pipettes, electronic Pipettes, Pipette Controllers and Dispensers, Micro Pipette Tips | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |