Drawing for ORMESA

USPTO serial 79003778

ORMESA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3085586Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 25, 2006
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORMESA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Wells IP Law299 South Main Street, Suite 1300Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Abdominal belts, abdominal pads, [ invalid hoists, invalid lifts, ] invalid walkers, [ medical braces for knee, ankle, elbow, chest, pelvis, ] medical equipment for pediatric patients, namely, [ multiple position safety seat, orthopedic belts, orthopedic braces, ] orthopedic supports, posture correction device, namely, an adjustable harness to correct one's posture, rollators, static electric therapy apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Pushchairs [ wheelchairs, bicycles, tricycles, chair lift, child carrying trailers for use in transporting children while hiking, jogging, children's car seat ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 10, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 14, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 27, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2012NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 201215AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Jun 27, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 27, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 24, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2012E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 9, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 26, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance