Drawing for ALTUS

USPTO serial 79003865

ALTUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3181053Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 5, 2006
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ALTUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marlene J. Williams

Marlene J. Williams Nixon Peabody LLPP.O. Box 26769SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94126-6769UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management consulting services in the marine shipping field; transportation logistic services, namely arranging the transportation of goods for others; transportation logistic management services, namely arranging and coordinating the transportation of goods for others and management of crew shifts; providing ship support staff servicesACTIVE—
039Charter of marine and river vessels; charter of aircraft; stevedoring; global transportation of freight for others by all available means; cargo container rental services; rental of vehicles; rental of lifting and loading-unloading machines and apparatus; rental of warehouse space; freight forwarding; freight cargo handling, transport brokerage and travel agency services, namely making reservations and bookings for transportation; ground support freight handling services; warehousing; warehouse storage of goods before and after transportation by land, water, and air; Port services, namely ship bunkering services, ship unloading, providing vessel mooring facilities and services, marine towing and providing services in connection with watering and garbage collection, on-line information services relating to the movement of cargo; ship brokerage, freight ship transport and cargo ship transport services; and the transportation consulting services in respect of the aforementioned services; excluding passenger air transportation services from all of the aboveACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 21, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 13, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 3, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 19, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 19, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 26, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2012CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2012EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 16, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 26, 2006CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance