Drawing for TEXGARD

USPTO serial 79003950

TEXGARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3041925Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 10, 2006
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TEXGARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Handelsman

Jeffrey H. Handelsman Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical compositions for applying on various surfaces to repel grease and oils, dirt and humidityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 13, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 9, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2017WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2017WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 21, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 18, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
May 17, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 17, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 17, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 10, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance