USPTO serial 79003957
IGP-DURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3100902Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 6, 2006
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with IGP-DURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kirchberg, CH-9500 Will, CH
Kirchberg, CH-9500 Will, CH
IGP Pulvertechnik Deutschland GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by IGP Pulvertechnik Deutschland GmbH
Kirchberg, CH-9500 Will, CH
Wil, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marshall J. Brown
Marshall J. Brown FOLEY & LARDNER LLP321 NORTH CLARK STREETSUITE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60654-4762Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Colorants for general industrial use; paints and lacquers; powder coatings for all kind of surfaces in the nature of coating compositions especially for metal surfaces comprised of resins and powdered synthetic materials, with or without pigments, applied to the surface elctrostatically and then sintered polymerized chemically by heatings | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Industrial research and development in the field of colorants, paints, lacquers and powder coatings ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IGP IG Pulvertechnik AG
- Other trademarks owned by IGP IG Pulvertechnik AG
- Other trademarks owned by IGP Pulvertechnik Deutschland GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by IGP IG Pulvertechnik AG
- Other trademarks owned by IGP Pulvertechnik AG
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IGP-DURA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2014 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 29, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 29, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |