Drawing for NOVALED

USPTO serial 79003970

NOVALED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3100903Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 6, 2006
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with NOVALED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*

Plus Government fees of $2,550

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Delfina S. Homen

Delfina S. Homen Miller Nash LLP1140 SW Washington St., Ste. 700PORTLAND, OR 97205United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Organic light emitting diodes [ ; blank magnetic data carriers; data processors; cameras, televisions, and telephones having displays based on organic light emitting diode technology ]ACTIVE
011Lamps based on organic light emitting diode technologyACTIVE
042Product research and development in the field of organic light emitting diodes and of goods with organic light emitting diodes; product research and development for others in the field of organic light emitting diodes and of goods with organic light emitting diodes; providing information in the field of product research in the field of organic light emitting diodes and of goods with organic light emitting diodes [ ; technology transfer services, namely, licensing and transfer of intellectual property ] [ ; computer hardware development ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2026PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15
Aug 25, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 5, 2026ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 2, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 26, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 25, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 10, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 25, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Sep 14, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 14, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 14, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 13, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 9, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2016PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Jul 11, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 3, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 19, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jul 19, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jul 18, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 24, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
May 24, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Mar 26, 2008CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Feb 28, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 6, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 12, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 6, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 9, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 26, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 12, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 12, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 27, 2005ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2005NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 2, 2004RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 8, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 13, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance