USPTO serial 79003978
LA VIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3063821Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2006
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA VIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IT
IT
IT
IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine, spirits, liqueurs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by "CANTINA LA VIS E VALLE DI CEMBRA SOCIETA' COOPERATIVA A RESPONSABILITA' LIMITATA" in sigla "CANTINA LA VIS S.C.A.R.L.", "C.S.L.S.S. S.C.A.R.L." - "C.S.L. S.C.A.R.L." - "CANLAV S.C.A.R.L.", "CIELLE S.
- Other trademarks owned by "CANTINA LA VIS E VALLE DI CEMBRA SOCIETA' COOPERATIVA A RESPONSABILITA' LIMITATA" in sigla "CANTINA LA VIS S.C.A.R.L.", "C.S.L.S.S. S.C.A.R.L." - "C.S.L. S.C.A.R.L." - "CANLAV S.C.A.R.L.", "CIELLE S.
- Other trademarks owned by "LA VIS S.C.A." in short form "L.V. S.C.A." - "C.S.L.S.S. S.C.A." "C.S.L. S.C.A." - "CANLAV S.C.A." - "CIELLE S.C.A."
- Other trademarks owned by "CANTINA LA VIS E VALLE DI CEMBRA SOCIETA' COOPERATIVA A RESPONSABILITA' LIMITATA" in sigla "CANTINA LA VIS S.C.A.R.L.", "C.S.L.S.S. S.C.A.R.L." - "C.S.L. S.C.A.R.L." - "CANLAV S.C.A.R.L.", "CIELLE S.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named LA VIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | ERFT | TEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |