USPTO serial 79004004
TECHNOCOM CORP.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3104103Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 13, 2006
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHNOCOM CORP.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible oils and fats, namely, butter and butter substitutes, edible oil, olive oil, palm oil for food, rice bran oil for food, vegetable oils and fats for food; potato crisps; potato chips; fruit chips; condiments namely, pepper oil; dried vegetables; eggs; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; milk based beverages containing fruit juice; milk beverages containing fruits; milk beverages with high milk content; milk-based beverage containing coffee; preserved vegetables in oil; processed cooked vegetables and fruits; preserved, dried and cooked vegetables, namely, vegetable paste | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Preparations made from cereal, namely, biscuits, butter biscuits, savoury and salted biscuits, cakes, cake mixes, Chinese rice noodles in the nature of uncooked bifun, uncooked Chinese noodles, corn meal, corn flakes, crackers, waffles, wheat flour for food, wheat starch flour, food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and/or cookies, instant noodles, flour for food, potato flour for food, macaroni, macaroni salad, noodles, pasta for soups, pounded rice cakes in the nature of mochi, pellet-shaped rice crackers in the nature of arare, rice, rice cakes, rice salad, rice starch flour, rice crackers in the nature of senbei, spaghetti; confectionery, namely, candy cake decorations, edible cake decorations, edible decorations for cakes, peanut butter confectionery chips; cocoa, namely, cocoa beverages with milk; spices, namely, chili seasoning, flavourings for cakes other than essential oils, flavourings for butter, flavourings for soups, pimiento used as a condiment, seasonings, vegetable concentrates used for seasoning; relish | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by "Technokom" Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by "Technokom" Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by "Technokom" Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named TECHNOCOM CORP.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |