Drawing for GOLDEN COAL

USPTO serial 79004061

GOLDEN COAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3046332Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 17, 2006
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDEN COAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Industrial oils and greases; industrial lubricants; dust absorbing, wetting and binding compositions; fuels, namely charcoal for barbeques, and motor oil; illuminants, namely candles and wicks for lightingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 17, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 25, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 14, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 11, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Apr 11, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 11, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 20, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 6, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2005CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 14, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance