Drawing for PEBBLES

USPTO serial 79004108

PEBBLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEBBLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitations of leather, goods made of these materials not included in other classes; trunks; suitcases; traveling trunks; vanity cases; attaché cases; briefcases; wallets; purses not made of precious metal; document holders; bags included in this class, particularly handbags, traveling bags and sports bags; garment bags; traveling sets; toiletry bagsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 12, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 1, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 10, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance