Drawing for TROUBLE

USPTO serial 79004144

TROUBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3032464Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 20, 2005
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TROUBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurel V. Dineff

Laurel V. Dineff WWIPPS, Inc.160 North Wacker DriveCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes, eaux de toilette, [ deodorants for personal use, ] essential oils for personal use, oils for cosmetic purposes, [ skin soaps, ] non-medicated toiletries, beauty care milks, cosmetics,[ make-up and make-up removing preparations, ] non-medicated skin care preparations, [ preparations for weight loss in the nature of lotions for cellulite reduction, bath lotion, and suntanning preparations ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 12, 2021INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 18, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 14, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 29, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 30, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 30, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 12, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 10, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance