USPTO serial 79004171
BENIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3853656Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2010
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BENIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Peter Spies
R. Peter Spies Dineff Trademark Law Limited160 North Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing [ and leather clothes ], namely, shirts, short-sleeved shirts, [ skirts, suits, jackets, ] trousers, [ short trousers, jumpers, woolen socks, pajamas, stockings, vests, corsets, sock suspenders, ] undershorts, [ brassieres, ] underclothing, [ hats, scarves, ties, waterproof pants and jackets, overcoats, coats, swimming costumes, sport suits, wind-resistant jackets, ski trousers, belts, pelisses, sashes for wear, ] gloves [, dressing gowns; shoes in general, namely, slippers, shoes, boots, sandals, and shoes for sports, namely, baseball shoes and football shoes ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | [ Amusement game machines, backgammon game sets, basketball table top games, billiard game playing equipment, board games, card games, coin-operated video games, electronic educational game machines for children, game tables, gymnastic apparatus, bags specially adapted for sports equipment, sport balls; parlor games ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Scheuing Sport AG
- Other trademarks owned by BENIX S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by BENIX S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by BENIX S.r.l.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BENIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 28, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |