USPTO serial 79004216
SABBIA ROSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SABBIA ROSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM C WRIGHT
WILLIAM C WRIGHT EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES LLPLINCOLN BLDG60 E 42ND ST STE 820NEW YORK, NY 10165Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery, cosmetics | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, women's underwear, bras, panties, camisoles, garters, stocking suspenders, mules, housecoats, and dressing gowns, string, petticoat, underskirt, nightdress, shirt, blouse, pants, bikini bottom, footwear namely sleepers, dress shoes and headgear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |