Drawing for Serial No. 79004268

USPTO serial 79004268

Serial No. 79004268

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79004268?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant services featuring meals of yakitori, a traditional Japanese grilled chicken skewer, and alcoholic beveragesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 21, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 21, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance