USPTO serial 79004269
KISS MY....
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KISS MY....?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical goods, namely optical frames, optical glasses, optical lenses | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely shirts, tee-shirts, blouses, dresses, skirts, brassieres, girdles, slips, overcoats, raincoats, jackets, jumpers, pull-overs, cardigans, jeans, trousers, caps, scarves, gloves, women's swimsuits, men's swimming costumes, children's swimwear, singlets, vests, shorts, men's underwear, women's underwear, children's underwear, socks, pantyhose | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kim Lauren James
- Other trademarks owned by Kim Lauren James
- Other trademarks owned by Robert Michael James
- Other trademarks owned by Robert Michael James
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named KISS MY....
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2006 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |