USPTO serial 79004304
IDEMITSU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3006060Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2005
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with IDEMITSU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ee Ming T. Bahk
Ee Ming T. Bahk Oliff PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | [ fuels; ] industrial oils, namely, lubricating oils for automotive, [marine ] and industrial use, cutting oils, oils used in the tempering of metals, automotive and industrial greases, and heat transfer oils;[ non-mineral oils and greases comprising of fatty acids and ester thereof for industrial purposes, not for fuel; wax; grease for shoes and boots; solid lubricants; leather preserving oils and greases; lamp wicks; candles; tapers ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 18, 2021 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 23, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | PR15 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 15 | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |