USPTO serial 79004374
GUITARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3117295Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2006
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GUITARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William F. Herbert,
WILLIAM F HERBERT STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Coverlets, bed blankets and linen, table linens, handkerchiefs and mattress covers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 29, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |