USPTO serial 79004379
SIGMATEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIGMATEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin W. Guynn
Kevin W. Guynn Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.300 South Wacker DriveSuite 2500Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools, namely servo motors | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | Scientific, electric, electronic, measuring, signaling and inspection apparatus and instruments, namely, industrial personal computers, distributed automation systems programmable logic controller modules and servo-systems comprised of hydraulic actuators, pneumatic actuators, electric motors, and an electronic control; module carriers, operating computer terminals, bus systems comprised of decentralized electronic modules and wires; and electronic automation and control installations comprised of electronic components for industrial and commercial machines | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Developing computer programs for electronic automation and control installations for industrial and commercial machines and consultation services relating to such computer programs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIGMATEK AUTOMATISIERUNGSTECHNIK GESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. & Co KG
- Other trademarks owned by Sigmatek GmbH & Co KG
- Other trademarks owned by Sigmatek GmbH & Co KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SIGMATEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2009 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |