Drawing for QUICK STEP ELEGANCE

USPTO serial 79004398

QUICK STEP ELEGANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3082937Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 18, 2006
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUICK STEP ELEGANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900BRONX, NY 10471-0900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Parquet flooring, planks, tiles and panels for floors, walls and ceilings; all the aforesaid goods made out of wood or wood and/or wood fibre, or being laminates; flooring as underfloors and false floors, also in the form of non-metallic mats; profiles and floor skirting boards; non-metallic covers for use with floors and parts thereofSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 26, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 25, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 13, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 9, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 25, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 17, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 16, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 9, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 6, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance