USPTO serial 79004433
WE ARE THE SUPERLATIVE CONSPIRACY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3041949Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2006
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WE ARE THE SUPERLATIVE CONSPIRACY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence R. Robins
Lawrence R. Robins FisherBroyles LLP4 MacQuarrie LaneWestford, MA 01886UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | goods made of leather and imitations of leather, namely, leather shopping bags, leather business card cases, leather business cases, leather key cases, leather attache cases, leather wallets, leather felt pouches, leather drawstring pouches, leather tool pouches sold empty, animal skins and hides; trunks and traveling bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harnesses saddlery | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, woven and knitted jackets, woven and knitted pants, woven and knitted shirts, knitted t-shirts and tank tops, knitted sweaters and sweatshirts, gloves, underwear, mufflers, scarves; footwear; headwear, namely, hats, caps and bandanas | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONCORD VENTURES PTE LTD
- Other trademarks owned by We Rock AB
- Other trademarks owned by Vestum AB (publ)
- Other trademarks owned by We Rock AB
- Other trademarks owned by We Rock AB
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named WE ARE THE SUPERLATIVE CONSPIRACY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 29, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 16, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |