USPTO serial 79004447
EHRMANN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3158855Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with EHRMANN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joyce B. Klemmer
Joyce B. Klemmer Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP1230 Peachtree Street, N.E.Suite 3100 - PromenadeATLANTA, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Milk, dairy products, not including ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; milk-based beverages containing fruit juice; fermented milk, ] yogurt, [ yogurt-based beverages, kefir, kefir with fruit; buttermilk; cream; whey, whey-based beverages; milk-based beverages; powdered milk for food purposes; curd-based product, namely, curd cheese; skim milk; butter; cheese; edible fats ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [ Bakery desserts containing milk and cream and also using binding agents of starch; dessert souffles, dessert mousses, dessert puddings; ice milk; frozen yogurt; milk shakes; ice cream; sauces, salad dressings; herbal food beverages ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | [ Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, apple juice beverages, fruit drinks, energy drinks, vegetable drinks, whey beverages, soy-based beverages used as a milk substitute; preparations for making fruit drinks, energy drinks, vegetable drinks, whey beverages ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ehrmann AG Oberschönegg im Allgäu
- Other trademarks owned by Ehrmann AG Oberschönegg im Allgäu
- Other trademarks owned by Ehrmann AG Oberschönegg im Allgäu
- Other trademarks owned by Ehrmann USA Holding, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named EHRMANN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |