USPTO serial 79004486
HYPERLOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3041950Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2006
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with HYPERLOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-52146 Würselen, DE
D-52146 Würselen, DE
Würselen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Jennings
Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP1200 Seventeenth Street, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ CHIP REMOVING, SEPARATING, AND TRANSFORMING MACHINES, NAMELY, COATING MACHINES FOR USE IN COATING SUBSTRATES WITH THIN FUNCTIONAL LAYERS PRODUCED FROM THE SEPARATION OF VAPORS AND GASSES, CUTTING MACHINES, PUNCHING MACHINES, SQUEEZING MACHINES, GRINDING MACHINES, BORING MACHINES, LATHES, AND GEAR CUTTING AND FINISHING MACHINES FOR METAL WORKING IN THE FIELD OF COATINGS; MECHANICAL DEVICES, NAMELY, METALWORKING MACHINE TOOLS; MECHANICAL TOOLS FOR USE IN THE PHYSICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION COATING OF TOOLS WITH A HARDENED SURFACE MATERIAL; AND MACHINERY, NAMELY, METALWORKING MACHINE TOOLS FOR COATING TOOLS AND WORK PIECES WITH HARD MATERIALS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | [ MANUALLY OPERATED TOOLS COATED BY PHYSICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION, NAMELY, PUNCHES, HAND-HELD CUTTING TOOLS, CLAMPS, DIES, DRILLS, MANUALLY-OPERATED GRINDING WHEELS, PINCHERS, TONGS, SCRAPERS, SAWS, WRENCHES, AND VICES ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Material treatment, namely coating of tools and work pieces of metal with hard materials using PVD-coating machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CemeCon AG
- Other trademarks owned by CemeCon AG
- Other trademarks owned by CemeCon AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named HYPERLOX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 22, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |