USPTO serial 79004590
INFACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and programs for use in processing data from the analysis of the evaluation and quantification of deposits | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Professional consulting services, unrelated to business, but in the field of drilling; drilling | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Data analyses, testing of materials, professional consulting, technical research in the field of deposit evaluation and quantification; technical surveillance and inspection; engineering project design; computer programming; engineering services and research work in the field of deposit evaluation and quantification; oil and drilling engineering services; planning services, unrelated to business, but in the field of drilling; analyses, prospection, testing, checking and experiments with oil and drilling equipment; prospection research and analysis of all ground and underground substances, particularly of petroleum, rocks, minerals, gases and natural oils, measurement services (engineering services) and technical expertise, and engineering services, and particularly services consisting of providing a document including on the same paper media or on any computer media, according to the time or according to the depth of drilling, loggings and geological drilling parameter data curves obtained by means of surface measurements; measurement services (engineering services) in oil wells or not; data programming services; all these services are in connection with the goods listed in class 9 | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 13, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |