USPTO serial 79004600
KIN NEW COLOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3063835Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2006
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIN NEW COLOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla
OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair colorants and hair bleaching preparations, hair lotions, hair lacquers, hair setting preparations, hair waving and curling preparations, hair creme, hair shampoos, perfumes and perfumery, toilet soaps, shower and bath gel soaps | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |