USPTO serial 79004601
KINCREM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3063836Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2006
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with KINCREM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Sullivan
Todd A. Sullivan Hayes Soloway P.C.175 CANAL STREETMANCHESTER, NH 03101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair colorants and hair bleaching preparations [ , hair lotions, hair lacquers, hair setting preparations, hair waving and curling preparations, hair creme, hair shampoos, perfumes and perfumery, toilet soaps, shower and bath gel soaps ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |