USPTO serial 79004657
ONELOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3057915Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 2006
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONELOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
S-M-L TEKSTIL SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by S-M-L TEKSTIL SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
S-M-L TEKSTIL SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by S-M-L TEKSTIL SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
EBC TEKSTIL TURIZM SAGLIK HIZMETLERI VE INSAAT SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
S-M-L TEKSTIL SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by S-M-L TEKSTIL SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, overcoats, coats, raincoats, jackets, trousers, skirts, dresses, suits, waistcoats, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, pullovers, blouses, sweaters, overalls, underwear, undershirts, underpants, panties, brassieres, bodices, corsets, jean clothing and leather clothing, namely, pants, jackets and vests, beach cover-ups, gloves; clothing for babies, namely, textile diapers, layettes, infant and toddler one piece clothing, nylon diapers, bibs not made of paper; socks; footwear, namely, shoes, boots, sandals, slippers, sports shoes, heels, footwear uppers; headgear, namely, caps, hats, berets, skull caps, hoods, knit caps, rain hats, bandanas, headbands; ties, neckties, scarves, mufflers, neck scarves, sarongs, collars for dresses, maniples, muffs, wristbands, belts, suspenders, braces for clothing, garters | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S-M-L TEKSTIL SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by S-M-L TEKSTIL SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by EBC TEKSTIL TURIZM SAGLIK HIZMETLERI VE INSAAT SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by S-M-L TEKSTIL SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ONELOOK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |