USPTO serial 79004685
EXCELLENCE MEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3294153Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2007
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXCELLENCE MEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BREWSTER TAYLOR
BREWSTER TAYLOR STITES & HARBISON PLLC1199 N FAIRFAX STSTE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS IN THE FIELD OF ADVERTISING THROUGH THE MEDIA | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND ASSISTANCE TO INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL COMPANIES, NAMELY, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND ASSISTANCE IN THE FIELDS OF ADVERTISING THROUGH THE MEDIA, RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS IN THE FIELD OF ADVERTISING THROUGH THE MEDIA, ADVERTISING CONTRACTS WITH THE MEDIA AND MEDIA ADVERTISING BUDGETS, STRATEGIES FOR ADVERTISING THROUGH THE MEDIA, AND MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF MEDIA PERFORMANCE IN THE FIELD OF ADVERTISING; BUSINESS CONSULTING, NAMELY, CONSULTATION IN THE FIELDS OF ADVERTISING THROUGH THE MEDIA, MEDIA ADVERTISING COSTS, BUDGETS, AND CONTRACT TERMS, STRATEGIES FOR ADVERTISING THROUGH THE MEDIA AND MEDIA PERFORMANCE IN ADVERTISING | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, TEACHING IN THE FIELD OF ADVERTISING STRATEGY THROUGH THE MEDIA AND ORGANIZATION OF COMPETITIONS AND TRAINING SEMINARS IN THE FIELD OF ADVERTISING STRATEGY THROUGH THE MEDIA | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EXCELLENCE MEDIA
- Other trademarks owned by EXCELLENCE MEDIA
- Other trademarks owned by EXCELLENCE MEDIA
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named EXCELLENCE MEDIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 25, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ISIR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |