Drawing for MEDERAÑO

USPTO serial 79004691

MEDERAÑO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3021170Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 29, 2005
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDERAÑO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa W. Rosaya

Lisa W. Rosaya Baker & McKenzie LLP452 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, coffee substitutes; flour and cereal-based snack food; bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, fruit jellies, edible ice; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, condiments namely sauces; spices; ice for refreshmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
032Beers; mineral and sparkling water and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely water and soft drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups for making beverages, namely fruit drinks and soft drinksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
033WinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 28, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 18, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 1, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 1, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 13, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2013INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 17, 2013INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2011INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 25, 201115AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Apr 25, 201171.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 18, 2011EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2011PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Mar 16, 2011CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 15, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 14, 201115AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Mar 14, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2010RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 5, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2007COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
May 24, 2007FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Dec 15, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 11, 2006COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Dec 11, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jul 26, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 16, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2006AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Mar 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance