USPTO serial 79004707
CILAS MARSEILLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 31, 2006
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CILAS MARSEILLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FR
COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DES LASERS - CILAS
FR
Other trademarks owned by COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DES LASERS - CILAS
COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DES LASERS - CILAS
FR
Other trademarks owned by COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DES LASERS - CILAS
COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DES LASERS - CILAS
FR
Other trademarks owned by COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DES LASERS - CILAS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD M. LABARGE
RICHARD M LABARGE MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN233 S WACKER DR STE 6300 SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6357UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for manufacturing optical instruments and apparatus, namely magnetron sputtering machines and deposition chambers; interferometers, profilometers, and spectrophotometers for treating optical components; and machines for treating optical components, namely machines for polishing and coating optical components | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | optical apparatus and instruments, namely laser diodes and laser telemeters, and components sold as a unit therewith; computer software for monitoring inspection machines for quality assurance in the field of lasers; lasers not for medical use; masers; Raman lasers; telemeters lasers; optical guidance systems comprising light beam generators; laser detectors for toxic agents; laser granulometers; optoelectronic measuring systems comprising a light source and a detector that delivers an electrical signal that varies based on the amount of light received by the detector; binoculars; and electro-optical devices, namely couplers and integrated circuits | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | installation of optical apparatus and instruments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | treatment of surfaces, namely cleaning, coating, polishing, spraying, and depositing high-energy coatings on optical surfaces by ion beams; treatment of materials, namely coating metals with optical coatings; and assembly of optical apparatus and instruments for others | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | engineering; technical research in the field of optical apparatus and instruments; design of optical apparatus and instruments for others; design of lasers for others; expertise work, namely drawing up of expert technical opinions in the field of optical instruments and apparatus for others; material testing; design, installation, maintenance, and updating software for operating machines for manufacturing optical instruments and apparatus | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CILAS MARSEILLE
- Other trademarks owned by COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DES LASERS - CILAS
- Other trademarks owned by COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DES LASERS - CILAS
- Other trademarks owned by COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DES LASERS - CILAS
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CILAS MARSEILLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |