Drawing for CAVIFLEX

USPTO serial 79004763

CAVIFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3021173Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 29, 2005
Examiner
CHOE, KELLY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAVIFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY M. NATH

GARY M NATH NATH & ASSOCIATES PLLC112 S W STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial machines and installations for finishing textiles, particularly for woven, machine-knitted and non-woven materials as well as components for such machines and installations; installations for feeding, removing, winding and transporting bands of materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Industrial heaters and industrial dryers for heating and drying bands of textile materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 25, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 25, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 28, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 14, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 16, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 2005CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 23, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance