Drawing for BALANCE

USPTO serial 79004793

BALANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3090443Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 9, 2006
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BALANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth W. King

Elizabeth W. King Conley Rose, P.C.P. O. Box 3267HOUSTON, TX 77253-3267UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Electric apparatus and instruments, namely, ] [ electric hair curlers, ] [ bathroom scales,] [ epilators, ] [ electric irons, barometers, answering machines, binoculars, compasses, curling tongs ]SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
010Medical apparatus and instruments, namely, sphygmomanometers, massage apparatus for feet, oral irrigators and pulsimetersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Heating [ and drying ] apparatus, namely, [ hair dryers, ] electrically heated mattress covers not for medical use and heating cushions not for medical useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 26, 2014INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 12, 2013INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 6, 2013ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Sep 3, 2013INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 7, 2013LNNXLIMITATION HAS NO EFFECT PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2012INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 25, 2012LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2012COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 25, 2012PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 11, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 9, 2011A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Nov 9, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 8, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 7, 2011ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 16, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 2, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance