USPTO serial 79004808
ONE THE FUNCTIONAL DRINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3660975Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 28, 2009
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONE THE FUNCTIONAL DRINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Schwartz
Robert M. Schwartz ROBERT M. SCHWARTZ, P.A.P.O. Box 221470Hollywood, FL 33022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk beverages, namely, Acidophilus milk, chocolate milk, condensed milk, milk, milk based beverages containing fruit juice, milk beverages containing fruits, milk-based beverage containing coffee, Soybean milk | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters, flavored waters, Sparkling water, Spring water, Still water and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, carbonated beverages, Coffee-flavored soft drinks, Energy drinks, Ginger ale, Guarana drinks, Herbal juices, Isotonic drinks, Lemonade, Nonalcoholic aperitifs, Nonalcoholic beer, Nonalcoholic beverages containing fruit juices, Nonalcoholic beverages with tea flavor, Nonalcoholic cocktail mixes, Pop, Smoothies, Soda pops, Soft drinks flavored with tea, carbonated soft drinks, low calorie soft drinks, non carbonated soft drinks, Sports drinks, all of the above excluding colas and cola-flavored beverages; fruit drinks and fruit juices; Concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks other than colors and cola-flavored beverages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely Alcoholic bitters, Alcoholic beverages of fruit, Alcoholic coffee-based beverage, Aperitifs, Brandy, Calvados, Champagne, Cognac, Curacao, Distilled Spirits, Gin, Grappa, Kirsch, Red Wine, Rum, Sake Schnapps, Sherry, Tequila, Tonic liquor containing herb extracts, Vermouth, Vodka, Whiskey, White Wine, Wine punch | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Karl LICHTENEGGER
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Karl LICHTENEGGER
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Karl LICHTENEGGER
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named ONE THE FUNCTIONAL DRINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 19, 2011 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |