Drawing for CTC

USPTO serial 79004811

CTC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3171646Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 14, 2006
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with CTC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle P. Ciotola

Michelle P. Ciotola CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH STREETFLOOR 22HARTFORD, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management assistance to industrial and commercial companies in the field of leather, shoes and leather goods; business consulting, inquiries or information in the field of leather, shoes and leather goods[; computerized and central file management and business file management in the field of leather, shoes and leather goods; economic forecasting and analysis in the field of leather, shoes and leather goods]ACTIVE—
041Conducting seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of the manufacturing, designing, distribution and quality control of leather, shoes and leather goods; book and magazine publishing, book lending services in the field of the manufacturing, designing, distribution and quality control of leather, shoes and leather goodsACTIVE—
042[Computer services, namely, computer software design for others in the field of the manufacturing, designing, distribution and quality control of leather, shoes and leather goods; computer aided drafting services; engineering services; ]technical and scientific information services in connection with the field of leather, shoes and leather goods, namely, product testing for others in the field of leather, shoes and leather goods; quality control for others, testing of materials, namely, testing of raw material and chemicals used in the leather industry, textile testing, laboratory work in the field of leather, raw materials and chemicals used in the leather industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 28, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 23, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 8, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 24, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 24, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 24, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 14, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 8, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 14, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 24, 2012RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 20, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 13, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 29, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 2, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance