Drawing for NIIGATA

USPTO serial 79004844

NIIGATA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3087812Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 2, 2006
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NIIGATA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin M. Bovard

Kevin M. Bovard BAKER & HOSTELLER LLP1735 Market Street ,Suite 3300Philadelphia, PA 19103-7501United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation, re-installation, repair or maintenance of engines for vessels, railway vehicles, loading-unloading machines and apparatus, pumping machines and electrical power generatorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 2, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 19, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 5, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 28, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 2, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 26, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 8, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 8, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 1, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 6, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance