USPTO serial 79004850
COATINGSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3029395Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with COATINGSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph E. Locher
Ralph E. Locher LERNER GREENBERG STEMER LLPPO BOX 222480HOLLYWOOD, FL 33022-2480United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Peripheral devices for printing presses, namely, varnish supply machines for supplying varnish to printing units of a printing press | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Control consoles for controlling printing presses or varnish supply machines; control devices, namely, computers and processors for controlling printing presses or varnish supply machines; and computer software for controlling peripheral devices, namely, varnish supply machines ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
- Other trademarks owned by Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
- Other trademarks owned by Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named COATINGSTAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| May 3, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |