Drawing for CARLA FRACCI GISELLE

USPTO serial 79004898

CARLA FRACCI GISELLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3329593Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 6, 2007
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARLA FRACCI GISELLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leo M. Loughlin

Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc607 14th Street NWSuite 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ Laundry bleaches; laundry soaps; laundry detergents; general purpose cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive liquids and powders; soaps; ] perfumery; [ essential oils; cosmetics; hair lotions; dentrifices ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 15, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 10, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 8, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 8, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 16, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 21, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 31, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 22, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Jan 22, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 22, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 4, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 6, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 21, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 14, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2006ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Dec 28, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Nov 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 17, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance