Drawing for Serial No. 79004968

USPTO serial 79004968

Serial No. 79004968

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79004968?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing; children's clothing; babies' diapers of textile; layettes (clothing); bibs, not of paper; capes for babies; raincoats; hats, hosiery; gloves (clothing)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 27, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 3, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 6, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 19, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 16, 2014LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 5, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
May 12, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 27, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Apr 20, 2005NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2005CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 7, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance