USPTO serial 79005045
EASYCUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3225228Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2007
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EASYCUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacqueline M. Stelling
JACQUELINE M STELLING KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON ET AL599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PACKING AND PACKAGING MATERIALS MADE OF PAPER AND/OR CARDBOARD FOR HOUSEHOLD AND INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES, NAMELY, CONTAINERS FOR HOLDING INDIVIDUAL PORTIONS OF FOOD, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS, AND AUTOMATIVE AND PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | PACKAGING CONTAINERS MADE OF PLASTIC-LIKE SYNTHETIC MATERIALS, NAMELY, CONTAINERS FOR HOLDING INDIVIDUAL PORTIONS OF FOOD, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS, AND AUTOMATIVE AND PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |