Drawing for TRUEDOS

USPTO serial 79005080

TRUEDOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3196911Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 9, 2007
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUEDOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely pumps, namely, diaphragm dosing pumps, digital diaphragm dosing pumps; piston diaphragm dosing pumps, centrifugal pumps, electric pumps, high pressure pumps for washing appliances and installations, pneumatic pumps, reverse osmosis pumps, rotary pumps, submersible pumps, suction pumps, water filtering pumps; and parts of all the aforementioned goods; motors and engines not for land vehicles for the aforementioned pumpsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Scientific, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, checking and supervision apparatus and instruments, namely, measurement pumps for measurement of water disinfection parameters, metering equipment, namely, digital diaphragm measuring pumps, metering pumps for dosing liquids, gases and dry media for use in chemical-physical water treatment, for use in chemical engineering and process engineering and for use in industrial manufacturing procedures; metering pumpsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Repair, namely repair of pumps and control mechanisms therefor; pump and metering and control equipment installation servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 5, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 5, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 28, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 18, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 6, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 28, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 28, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance